One place AMD has shown strength compared with Nvidia in its 5000 series of cards was mixed workloads. I don’t have a Quadro RTX 5000 to try to duplicate the results, but I do have a Radeon Pro W5700 and the 6800 performed as well or better in my 3D tests as in these benchmarks. The AMD Radeon Pro W6800 is a top-performer in floating point, based on these benchmarks from AMD. It has six mini-DisplayPort connectors on one side of the back panel and a grille on the other. It does have power connectors at the end of its length, so if your case is snug, you might have to purchase a couple of those cute little adapters that let you run the power cords from the other side. For starters, it is sleek, well-built, and fits nicely in both the first and second dual slots of my test rig. I’ve been fortunate enough to have a pre-release version of the W6800 with a pre-release driver, so I put it through its paces for a few days. The 6600M version, for embedding in laptops or other devices, has essentially identical specifications, with performance dependent partially on how an OEM configures its power envelope within its 65 to 90-watt range ( full specs). It can drive up to four 4K displays or one 8K display ( full specs). It does still include 28 ray-tracing accelerators. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600 is a single-slot, lower-cost board using the same architecture, but with only 8GB of non-ECC GDDR6 RAM and 1,792 stream processors. AMD is positioning the W6800 head to head with Nvidia’s top Quadro cards as you can see from this chart.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |